APRIL Daily Precipitation Records - WINNIPEG (since 1872)
Day |
High rainfall |
High
snowfall |
High Precip |
Day |
|||
1 |
14.2 |
1958 |
11.2 |
1933 |
14.2 |
1958 |
1 |
2 |
13.0 |
2010 |
18.0 |
2020 |
13.0 |
2010 |
2 |
3 |
17.8 |
1965 |
10.2 |
2003 |
19.8 |
1965 |
3 |
4 |
29.0 |
1927 |
16.0 |
1999 |
34.0 |
1927 |
4 |
5 |
20.3 |
1929 |
22.0 |
1997 |
35.0 |
1997 |
5 |
6 |
10.7 |
1912 |
22.9 |
1884 |
22.9 |
1884 |
6 |
7 |
33.3 |
1963 |
7.6 |
1877 |
33.3 |
1963 |
7 |
8 |
17.3 |
1894 |
9.7 |
1919 |
26.4 |
1894 |
8 |
9 |
10.4 |
1878 |
4.8 |
1933 |
10.4 |
1878 |
9 |
10 |
18.5 |
1965 |
7.6 |
1887 |
18.5 |
1965 |
10 |
11 |
9.5 |
2005 |
7.6 |
1909 |
9.5 |
2005 |
11 |
12 |
16.5 |
2005 |
33.0 |
1872 |
33.0 |
1872 |
12 |
13 |
36.1 |
1911 |
25.0 |
2022 |
43.7 |
1911 |
13 |
14 |
12.7 |
1877 |
12.7 |
1923 |
22.2 |
1991 |
14 |
15 |
21.3 |
1924 |
12.4 |
1907 |
21.3 |
1924 |
15 |
16 |
24.9 |
1963 |
10.2 |
1910 |
25.1 |
1963 |
16 |
17 |
16.0 |
2012 |
9.7 |
1888 |
16.0 |
2012 |
17 |
18 |
30.0 |
1971 |
12.7 |
1902 Z |
30.0 |
1971 |
18 |
19 |
20.6 |
1894 |
14.0 |
1996 |
28.2 |
1894 |
19 |
20 |
32.5 |
1967 |
12.4 |
1970 |
32.5 |
1967 |
20 |
21 |
10.2 |
1974 |
10.4 |
1954 |
10.4 |
1954 |
21 |
22 |
26.7 |
1878 |
5.0 |
2017 |
26.7 |
1878 |
22 |
23 |
32.4 |
2022 |
1.8 |
1954 |
32.4 |
2022 |
23 |
24 |
15.5 |
1908 |
17.3 |
1937 |
21.2 |
1996 |
24 |
25 |
16.0 |
1939 |
16.5 |
1960 |
16.5 |
1960 |
25 |
26 |
35.1 |
1901 |
8.9 |
1918 |
35.1 |
1901 |
26 |
27 |
28.7 |
1892 |
20.8 |
1966 |
43.2 |
1892 |
27 |
28 |
33.0 |
1954 |
8.1 |
1958 |
33.0 |
1954 |
28 |
29 |
35.3 |
1896 |
8.1 |
1950 |
35.3 |
1896 |
29 |
30 |
36.6 |
1896 |
8.6 |
1991 |
44.1 |
1986 |
30 |
Apr 18, 1902 - Contradictory info exists about the snowfall. St John's College observer notes show 1.3 cm (0.5 in). A weekly summary by the Free Press also suggests only 1.3 cm (0.5 in). ECCC has 12.7 cm. I have chosen to not change the value, however, because a government publication from 1903 showed the same snow amount as the ECCC archives for April, suggesting the 12.7 cm on Apr 18 is *potentially* correct. Note that Stony Mountain and Oakbank only had 5cm or less. I am leaning toward the 12.7 cm being erroneous, however, I feel I need more evidence to confirm it.
Graph form: